Peer Review Process

In the review process, Jurnal Abdimas Le MUJTAMAK (JAL) involves writers, editors, and reviewers. Where in the review process, this journal applies the Blind Review process to maintain confidentiality. Peer review helps the editorial team in making editorial decisions that must be communicated to the author.

Every submitted manuscript is checked first by the editor. If the article meets the focus and scope and the writing guidelines, then the document is continued to the reviewer to review the content and novelty of the manuscript. Otherwise, the manuscript will be returned to the author. The articles of the writers will be forwarded to reviewers in accordance with their competence in the field of law. Articles that have been submitted take an average of about 8 weeks to publish.

Peer review helps the editorial team in making editorial decisions that must be communicated to the author. Every article sent and received must be treated as a confidential document. Without prior approval from the editor, any manuscripts may not be disclosed or discussed with other third parties. The peer review process is carried out objectively. The author is not allowed to submit criticisms in connection with peer review. The peer review must provide their expert opinion regarding the contents of the manuscript and its parts and provide supporting arguments.

It should be noted that articles published by Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak have never been published in other media. Articles are free from academic plagiarism and malpractice. The editor evaluates the article with fair and objective treatment regardless of race, gender, religion, ethnicity, citizenship, or the author's political philosophy.

 

---

SECTION POLICIES

ARTIKEL

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed