Administrative Court as Bureaucratic Reform Catalyst through Administrative Law Enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1075Keywords:
Administrative Court, Bureaucratic Reform, Good Governance, Law Enforcement, Legal CatalystAbstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) in Indonesia plays a vital role not only in supervising the legality of government actions but also in promoting bureaucratic reform. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the role of PTUN as a catalyst for bureaucratic reform, the challenges it faces in resolving administrative disputes, and the opportunities it can leverage to enhance public service quality and governance. The research employs a normative juridical method, using analysis of legislation, court decisions, legal literature, and relevant administrative judicial practices. The findings indicate that PTUN functions beyond its judicial capacity by upholding good governance principles, creating legal precedents, and correcting deviant administrative actions. However, the court's effectiveness is hindered by structural and cultural constraints, such as weak regulations on decision enforcement, the absence of supervisory mechanisms, and a low compliance culture. This study concludes that through institutional reform, legal process digitalization, human resource development, and cross-sector collaboration, PTUN can strengthen its role in shaping a more efficient, accountable, and responsive bureaucracy.Downloads
References
Septiana, D., & Nuswardani, N. (2024). Perlindungan Kepada Warga Negara Melalui PTUN terhadap Penyalahgunaan Wewenang oleh Pejabat Publik. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 2(4), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v2i4.4191
Seipul, S., Adepio, M. F., & Ardhan, M. U. (2024). Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menegakkan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum. Action Research Literate, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v8i5.343
Samia, & Wibowo, A. (2023). Dampak Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintah. AL-SULTHANIYAH, 12(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v12i2.1625
Putra, H. P. (2022). Challenges In The Examination Of Government Administrative Action Cases In Administrative Court. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 5(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.512022.75-94
Navisa, F. D. (2024). Reformulasi Peradilan Elektronik Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Reformasi Di Era Digital 4.0. Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, 5(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v5i1.92
Somantri, D. (2021). Challenges In Execution Of Court Decision To Strengthen The Administrative Court Charisma. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 4(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.422021.123-140
Morris, J. C., & Miller-Stevens, K. (Ed.). (2015). Advancing Collaboration Theory (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749242
Ananda, L. A. (2023). Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Berperan Mengontrol Administrasi Pemerintah. REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v10i2.9382
Satria, R., Wagner, I., Utomo, S., Fitriani, R. A., & Astono, A. (2022). Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang Dikecualikan dari Yurisdiksi Pemeriksaan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v2i3.88
Ayub & Wibowo, A. (2023). Optimalisasi Penanganan Pengaduan (Whistleblowing System) Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.6
Bedner, A., & Wiratraman, H. P. (2019). The Administrative Courts: The Quest for Consistency. Dalam M. Crouch (Ed.), The Politics of Court Reform (1 ed., hlm. 133–148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636131.006
Soekanto, S. (2015). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayu Media.
Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group,.
Lopa, B. (1988). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Majelis Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Ketetapan MPR No. VIII/MPR/2000 (LN Tahun 2000 No. ) Jo. Ketetapan MPR No.X/MPR/2001 (LN. Tahun 2001) tentang Rekomendasi MPR kepada Lembaga-lembaga Tinggi Negara.
Riza, D. (2018). Pengaturan Terhadap Hakikat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v3n1.7
Wahyudi, A. (2021). Eksekutorial Putusan Ptun Sebagai Lembaga Yudikatif. Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam, 4(1).
Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Harahap, Z. (2013). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Flora, H. S., Thuong, M. T. H., & Erawati, R. D. (2023). The Orientation and Implications of New Criminal Code: An Analysis of Lawrence Friedman’s Legal System. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1169
Soleh, M. A. (2018). Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap. Mimbar Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.1604
Mulyana, M. (2024). Proses Penegakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap. HUMANIORUM, 2(3), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v2i3.54
Basah, S. (1997). Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Devitasari, A. A. (2021). Menakar Independensi Hakim Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1748
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Panggabean, H. P. (2002). Fungsi Mahkamah Agung Dalam Praktek Sehari-hari, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Palilingan, T. N., Mamahit, C. E. M., & Midu, S. (2023). Tantangan dan Perkembangan Upaya Administrasi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pertanahan. Amanna Gappa, 31(2), 94–107. Retrieved from https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/agjl/article/view/30823
Ramadhani, A. Z., Leonard, L. T., & Utama, K. W. (2022). Membedah Putusan PTUN Jakarta No. 230/G/Tf/2019/PTUN-JKT Terkait Perluasan Kewenangan Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mengenai Tindakan Faktual. Diponegoro Law Journal, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2022.33439
Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 43 Tahun 1991 tentang Ganti Rugi Dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaannya Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Utama, N. H., & Erliyana, A. (2020). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Ptun Dan Implikasi Dalam Pelaksanaannya. Pakuan Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v6i2.2140
Wijaya, M. P. H., & Ali, M. Z. (2021). Legislation Impediments in Reorganising Government Bodies in Indonesia. BESTUUR, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.51633
Sagalovitsch, É. (2016). Progress made and future prospects in the field of administrative litigation: A lawyer’s perspective [Bilan et perspective d’évolution de la qualité du procès administratif: Le point de vue d’un avocat]. Revue française d’administration publique, N° 159(3), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.159.0715
Aritonang, D. M., Harijanti, S. D., Muttaqin, Z., & Abdurahman, A. (2023). Extensive Jurisdiction of State Administrative Courts in Indonesia: Interpretation and Legal Coherence Issues. Public Integrity, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2290750
Priyatno, H., & Susilo, U. (2018). Democracy, Decentralization and Efficientcy: A Study of Bureaucratic Reforms in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 09011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187309011
Meier, K. J., Compton, M., Polga-Hecimovich, J., Song, M., & Wimpy, C. (2019). Bureaucracy and the Failure of Politics: Challenges to Democratic Governance. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1576–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874759
Hilal, M., Purnomo, A., & Arief, S. (2024). Transforming Human Resources: The Key to Revolutionizing Indonesian Legal Reform and Justice System Efficiency. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 1469–1504. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.16495
Herlambang, P. H., & Sulistiyono, T. (2020). Peran Pengadilan Dalam Proses Eksekusi Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semaran. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 3(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v3i1.48952
Akhmad, M. Z. S. (2023). Implications of the Limits for Filing a Lawsuit to the State Administrative Court: Upholding Legal Certainty or Injuring Human Rights? Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68230
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aurick Adien Deseano, Najwa Hanif Artfian Arrasyid Aulia Putra, Moh. Imam Gusthomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
