The Transformation of Indonesia's Criminal Law System: A Comprehensive Comparative between the Old and New Penal Codes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1169Keywords:
National Penal Code, Criminal Law, Comparative Law, Legal ReformAbstract
The old Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), inherited from the Dutch Penal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht), is considered no longer relevant to the values of justice and the needs of contemporary Indonesian society. This study aims to compare the criminal law system and the criminal justice system under the new Penal Code, as well as to conduct an in-depth analysis of the fundamental legal principles embedded in both the old and new KUHP. The research employs a normative juridical method with comparative legal approach, analyzing the legal norms within both codes to identify substantial changes. The result indicate that the new KUHP reflects a paradigm shift from a repressive legal system to a more humanistic and restorative model, emphasizing human rights protection, gender-based justice, and the recognition of modern crimes such as sexual violence and organized crime. It also introduces alternative sanctions, including community service and rehabilitation, as efforts to support social reintegration. In conclusion, the new KUHP is not merely a replacement of the old code but a progressive step toward a more inclusive and contextually appropriate criminal law system. Comprehensive implementing regulations and ongoing evaluation are essential to ensure its effective application and real impact on society.Downloads
References
Adinda, D., Salam, A., Ramadhan, A., Narendra, A., Anasti, M., & Yanto, J. (2024). Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i1.16
Parindo, D., Daeng, Y., Atmaja, A. S., Putra, H. R., & Berson, H. (2024). Penerapan Konsep Dasar HAM dan Pembaharuan Tiga Pilar Utama Hukum Pidana dalam KUHP Baru UU No. 01 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(3), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v3i3.796
Saefudin, Y. (2021). Living Law in The Perspective of Progressive Law: The Urgency of Its Regulation in The Draft Indonesian Criminal Code. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 21(2), 358. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.2.3526
Hartanto, H. (2024). FENOMENA PENERAPAN HUKUM PIDANA MODERN TAHUN 2026. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 16(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v16i2.12161
Ramadhani, M. (2024). Tantangan Implementasi Pengakuan Hukum Adat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru di Indonesia. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(3), 714–722. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v4i3.1394
Anugrah, R., & Desril, R. (2021). Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.80-95
Mahmud, A., Firman, C. A., & Syawali, H. (2023). Urgensi Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v14i1.29496
Sutrisna, S. M. D. (2023). HUKUM ACARA PIDANA: PENERAPAN “DUE PROCESS OF LAW.” JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v5i2.5614
Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
S.E. Wahyuningsih. (2014). Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Materiel Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(1), 17–23. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1457
Muhammad, A. K. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Marzuki, P. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group,.
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press (AUP).
Romli Atmasasmita. (2000). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2815
Candra, S. (2013). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana; Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Yang Akan Datang. JURNAL CITA HUKUM, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.2979
Syafridatati. (2022). Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: LPPM Universitas Bung Hatta.
Romli Atmasasmita. (1996). Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme. Bandung: Bina Cipta.
Sudaryono, & Surbakti, N. (2017). Hukum Pidana: Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan KUHP dan RUU KUHP. Surakarta: MUP UMS.
Fitri, F. A., Muftia, N., Trilia, I., Munthe, A. H., & Ramlan, R. (2024). Tinjauan Teoritis tentang Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i2.134
Kristiyadi. (2023). Pergeseran Asas Legalitas Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum (JURDIKUM), 1(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.59435/jurdikum.v1i1.100
Suartha, I. D. M. (2015). Pergeseran Asas Legalitas Formal Ke Formal Dan Material Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8640
Sitorus, T., Harahap, M. R., Sembiring, F., & Hasibuan, S. A. (2023). Development of the Principle of Legality in Indonesian Criminal Law. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(01), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i01.418
Amir, F., Meifani, M. T. A., Satriadi, Setiyono, A., Miko, & Kristhy, M. E. (2023). Implementation of the Legality Principle in the Criminal Justice System of Indonesia. Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty, 1(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i2.139
Santoso, T. (2020). Asas Teritorialitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Pengertian Dan Perkembangannya. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 1(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v1i1.1
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Sulihin, L. O. M. (2019). Kekuatan Berlakunya Hukum Pidana Nasional Terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana di Negara Lain. Halu Oleo Law Review, 3(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v3i2.7105
Putri, D. K. (2022). Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.162-170
J. Krisnan. (2008). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional (Doctoral Dissertation). Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Situngkir, D. A. (2023). Yurisdiksi Universal Dan Keutamaan Negara Locus Delicti Untuk Mengadili Pelaku Kejahatan Internasional. Journal of Global Legal Review, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.59963/jglegar.v1i1.186
Yanto, A., & Hikmah, F. (2023). Akomodasi Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional Menurut Perspektif Asas Legalitas. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 2(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i2.14162
Daly Kathleen, & Rick, S. (2017). Criminal Justice System : Aims and Processes. Sydney: Lawbook.co.
Moeljatno. (2000). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Jensen Erik. (2011). Thesis : A Study Of Theory And Practice Of Effective Law Enforcement (Thesis). Loyola University Chicago, Chicago.
Jensen Erik. (2011). Introduction to the laws Of Timor-Leste Criminal Law. California: Stanford Law School.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roby Satya Nugraha, Edi Rohaedi, Nandang Kusnadi; Abid Abid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.