Reforming the Administrative Court Decision Execution Mechanism : Lessons from the Dutch Administrative Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i2.1275Keywords:
Execution of Decisions, Legal Reform, Administrative Justice, PTUNAbstract
The execution of final court rulings is a crucial element in realizing the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens in the administrative justice system. However, in practice, the execution of PTUN decisions in Indonesia still faces various obstacles, particularly in terms of effectiveness and compliance with government officials. This article examines the need for reforming the PTUN's execution mechanism by adopting lessons from the Dutch administrative justice system. The research method used is juridical-normative with a comparative law approach. Sistem Belanda menyoroti kewenangan yang lebih besar bagi hakim administrasi untuk memantau pelaksanaan putusan dan hukuman yang jelas bagi pejabat yang tidak patuh. The results of this study recommend institutional strengthening, expansion of judicial authority, and formulation of clearer legal instruments in the Indonesian PTUN system to ensure more effective and fair execution of decisions. These reforms are expected to increase public confidence in administrative courts and promote a culture of compliance among government officials.
Downloads
References
Aisyah, S. H., Munir, A., Zulkarnain, R. P., Djatmiati, T. S., Mazhuri, M., & Irianto, H. (2020). Legal Protection of Citizens: The Alcoholic Beverages in Licensing, Taxation, and Supervision in Indonesia. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 9(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/doi:10.4303/jdar/236087
Al’anam, M., & Ramli, L. (2024). The Expansion of the Absolute Competence of Administrative Courts: A Comparative Legal Study with the French Conseil d’État. Nagara Law Journal, 1(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijalgov.v1i02.36520
Szente, Z. (2017). Conceptualising the principle of effective legal protection in administrative law. Dalam The Principle of Effective Legal Protection In Administrative Law A European Comparison (pg. 9). New York: Informa Law From Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781315553979-3/conceptualising-principle-effective-legal-protection-administrative-law-zoltán-szente
Bell, J. S. (2006). Comparative Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/reasons-and-context-in-comparative-law/john-bells-principal-publications/B48C2DD67073FE1776ED91E4C5827367
Ramli, L. (2012). Peran Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Law Review, 12(1), 78. Retrieved from https://repository.unair.ac.id/116176/
Habibi, D. (2019). Perbandingan Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Negara Dan Verwaltungsgerich Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Rakyat. Jurnal Hukum& Pembangunan, 49(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2006
Noor, H. J. (2021). Application of Sanctions Against State Administrative Officials Failing to Implement Administrative Court Decisions. Bestuur, 9(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686
Szente, Z., & Lachmayer, K. (2017). The principle of effective legal protection in administrative law in The Netherlands. New York: Informa Law From Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553979
Hutchinson, T. (2015). The Doctrinal Method: Incorporating Interdisciplinary Methods in Reforming the Law. The European Law Students’ Association Law Review, 8(3), 135. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2734131
Rumadan, I. (2012). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 1(3), 438. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.435-462
Habibi, D. & Nuruzzaman M. S. (2023). Fungsionalisasi Hukum Responsif Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Peratun Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Kerangka Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jotika Research in Business Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v2i2.95
Al’anam, M. & Salman, R. (2024). The Relevance Of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory Of Communicative Action As The Philosophical Foundation Of Human Rights Enforcement In Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 36(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v36i1.11513
Prabowo, H. (2024). Jaminan Konstitusionalitas Atas Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan. Legal Standing Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(3), 710. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i3.9830
Hayati, Y. D. P., & Setiyono, J. (2023). Legal Administrative Review of Deviations in the Execution of State Administrative Court Decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-95
Kholik, S., Alhadi, M. N., Surahman, S., & Elviandri, E. (2025). Reformulasi Mekanisme Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Untuk Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sistem Administrasi Yudisial Indonesia. Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i3.3415
Ahmad, A., Putri, V. S., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Antara Otoritas dan Otonomi : Pertautan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Praktik Eksekusi Putusan PTUN. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2133
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Afiyanto, H., Aisyah, R. H. S., Nugraha, X., Mashuri, M., & Firmansyah, R. (2021). Analisis Pengujian Keputusan Penganugerahan Gelar Doktor Kehormatan (Doktor Honoris Causa) Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 79/Pk/Tun/2013. Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i2.5472
Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., & Grady, N. (2020). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Negara Hukum, 11(1), 46. https://doi.org/ 10.22212/jnh.v11i1.1574
Sugiharto, H., & Abrianto, B. O. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Non Yudisial Terhadap Perbuatan Hukum Publik Oleh Pemerintah. Yuridika, 33(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7280
Purnomo, W., Aisyah, R. H. S, Mulahela, T., & Nugraha, X. (2020). Analysis of Lawsuit Against the Factual Action which Conducted by Military after Law Number 30 Year 2014 Concerning Government Administration. UNRAM Law Review, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i1.107
Nasarudin, T. M. (2016). Asas dan Norma Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pembuatan Instrumen Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26555/kebaruan.v7i2.a5463
Latief, S. & Chandra, A. E. (2020). Penerapan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Administrasi: Perbandingan Indonesia, Australia Dan Belanda. Jurnal Judicial Review (JJR), 22(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i2.1497
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Al’anam, M. & Ramli, L. (2024). Pergeseran Eksistensi Putusan Niet Onvankelijkverklaard Pada Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Rumadan, I. (2013). Problem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia Dan Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.435-462
Amalia, R. A. (2024). Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Perspektif Hukum, 24(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278
Ilo, B. O. (2022). Functions Theories and Practice of Administrative Law in Contemporary Governance. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 3(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2492
Baxter, L. (1996). Administrative Law. Cape Town: Juta.
Gildenhuys, J. S. H. (2004). The Philosophy of Public Administration: A Holistic Approach. Stellenbosch: Sun Press. Retrieved from https://scholar.sun.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/9cbd0b06-b1f6-474a-ad36-1151707984d4/content
Tjandra, R. (2013). Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Consiel d’Etat Sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 20(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss3.art5
Aristawati, P. A. S. & Wati, R. U. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1(1), 182. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/indigenous/article/view/74755
Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Warta Darmawangsa, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349
Hooijdonk, M. V. & Eijsvoogel, P. (2012). Litigation in the Netherlands, Civil Procedure, Arbitration and Administrative Ligitation. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Suparto, S., Adindan, F. A., Esanov, A. E., & Normurotovna, Z. E. (2024). Administrative Discretion in Indonesia & Netherland Administrative Court: Authorities and Regulations. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.189
Djatmiati, T. S., et al. (2019). Forecasting Public Services Maladministration in Local Government. Dalam Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law And Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019 (hlm. 3). Sidoarjo: EAI - European Alliance for Innovation. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-2-2019.2286166
Verburg, A. & Schueler, B. (2014). Procedural Justice in Dutch Administrative Court Proceedings. Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 56–72. https://doi.org/DOI:%252010.18352/ulr.290
Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union. (2017). Administrative justice in Europe report for the Netherlands.
Algemene Wet Bestuusrecht/Undang-Undang Administrasi Umum.
Berge, L. V. D. (2017). The Relational Turn in Dutch Administrative Law. Utrecht Law Review, 13(1). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2926478
Djatmiati, T. S., et al. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.
Hadjon, P. M. (2015). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 TH. 2014 Tentang Administasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.51-64
Putrijanti, A. (2020). The Competence of the Administrative Court and Administrative Justice. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1890
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muklis Al'anam, Hendro Prabowo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



























































