COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSUMER DISPUTE RESOLUTION AT DISTRICT COURT AND CONSUMER DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AGENCY (BPSK)

Sahlevi Dwinanda

Authors

  • admin admin Universitas Islam Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v21i1.18

Keywords:

Resolution, Dispute, Consumer

Abstract

Development and development of the economy in general and specifically in the field of industry and national trade have produced various variations of goods and or services that can be consumed. The presence of the UUPK is a milestone in the development of consumer protection law. One thing that cannot be ruled out is that many consumers are less concerned about their rights, the UUPK states that resolving disputes can be taken through court or outside the court. The research method is normative juridical, and the purpose of this research is to analyzes Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 concerning the implementation of BPSK duties and authorities, and literature on consumer protection. Consumer dispute settlement through the court is only regulated by one of article 48 of the Consumer Protection Law which states that the settlement of consumer disputes through the courts refers to the provisions of the general court that apply with due observance of Article 45. BPSK is formed in the level II area, this is regulated in Article 49 UUPK, as the implementing regulation of the provisions issued Presidential Decree No. 90 of 2001 dated July 21, 2001 concerning the establishment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body. As a realization of the presidential decree, BPSK was formed to resolve disputes outside the court. Comparison of the effectiveness of the consumer dispute settlement mechanism at BPSK with the District Court in terms of time, process, and costs in dispute settlement is more affordable if through BPSK first.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

admin admin, Universitas Islam Jakarta

Jurnal Reformasi Hukum merupakan jurnal hukum yang terbit 1 tahun 2 kali, yaitu yang pertama januari-juni dan kedua juli-desember. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta, dengan tujuan sebagai wadah dan media komunikasi, serta sarana untuk mempublikasikan hasil kajian ilmiah dengan berbagai macam permasalahan yang aktual dalam bidang hukum, bagi kalangan dosen, peneliti, dan masyarakat. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum ini pernah terakreditasi Dikti, yaitu berdasarkan SK Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas Nomor 02/DIKTI/KEP/2002 dan SK Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas Nomor 55/DIKTI/KEP/2005.      

References

Emirzon, Joni, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan (Negoisasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi & Arbitrase), Gramedia pustaka utama, Jakarta, 2000.
Harahap, M Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005
Kritiyanti, Celine Tri Siwi. Hukum perlindungan konsumen (suatu pengantar). Cet Kedua. Jakarta : Diadit Media, 2008.
Moeljatno, Azas-azas Hukum Pidana, cet. 4 ,Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1987.
Miru, Ahmad dan Sutarman Yodo, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen,Jakarta: P.T Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.
Miru, Ahmadi. Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen di Indonesia, rajagrafindo Persada, 2011.
Nasution, AZ. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen (Suatu Pengantar), Cet. Kedua, Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2006.
Nining Muktamar, Zaim Zaidi, Ida Rustini, AS’ad Nugroho, Berperkara Secara Mudah, Murah dan Cepat Pengenalan Mekanisme Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa konsumen: Pelajaran dari Uni Eropa, Piramida, Ctkpertama, 2005.
Rahmawati, Intan Nur & Rukiyah Lubis, Win-Win Solution Sengketa Konsumen, Pustaka yustisia, 2014
Samsul, Inosentius. Perlindungan Konsumen Kemungkinan Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Mutlak Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Hukum, 2004.
Shofie, Yusuf. Pelaku Usaha, Konsumen, dan Tindak Pidana Korporasi. Cet. 1.Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002.
Shofie, Yusuf, Perlindungan Konsumen dan Instrumen-Instrumen Hukumnya, Cet. 2. Jakarta: Citra Adi Bakti, 2003.
Shofie, Yusuf dan Somi Awan. Sosok Peradilan Konsumen . Jakarta: Piramedia
Shofie, Yusuf. Perlindungan Konsumen dan Instrumen Hukumnya, cet. 2, Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Wijaya, Gunawan dan Ahmad Yani. Hukum Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Cet.3.Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2000
Wisnubroto, Al. dalam BIMTEK bagi anggota BPSK kota yogyakarta 2013-2017 diselenggarakan oleh bidang perdagangan disperindakoptan kota yogyakarta, 28 Agustus 2013.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen No, 8 tahun 1999.
, Undang-undang tentang kekuasaan Kehakiman Undang-undang No. 4, LN No. 8 Tahun 2004, TLN Nomor 4538.
, Keputusan Presiden Tentang Pembentukan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen No. 108, LN No. 145 Tahun 2004.
, Keputusan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia No. 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 Tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.
, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 2006 Tentang Tata Cara Pengajuan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen

Downloads

Published

2019-09-03

How to Cite

[1]
admin admin, “COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSUMER DISPUTE RESOLUTION AT DISTRICT COURT AND CONSUMER DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AGENCY (BPSK): Sahlevi Dwinanda”, Reformasi Hukum, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 110–138, Sep. 2019.