THE COMMANDITAIRE VENNOOTSCHAP (CV) MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN CASE OF BANKRUPTCY
Ahmad Fauzan Muslim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v21i2.20Keywords:
Responsibility, Management, Commanditaire Vennootschap, BankruptAbstract
The one of capital source of Limited Partnership in operating its business is obtained from loan of banking and non banking institution with certain guarantee. If the loan cannot be returned at the fall due and have could to be billed, hence the Limited Partnership can be expressed bankrupt by decision of Commercial Justice. CV is declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court decision, which is legally responsible are complementary ally ally because this should have an obligation to settle all the debts. Allied commanditair responsible only to ally complementary to submit a number of income (article 19 paragraph (1) Commercial code). In other words, a limited partner is only responsible to communion and complementary ally responsible inside or outside the alliance. Debtors are declared bankrupt there is irresponsible to the detriment of creditors and complicate Curator. The purpose of this study’s to know the responsibility of the Guild board Commanditaire if declared bankrupt and to identify any obstacles faced by creditors if the board of the Guild Commanditaire abdicate responsibility in it. Conclusion : (a) Allied complementary (ally active) must account for the alliance came to his personal fortune, while property ally limited partnership (ally passive) inviolability, Where ally complementary greater than one, then the responsibilities involve allies complementary other responsibilities renteng up on private property. (b) The obstacles faced by creditors if the board is not responsible Commanditaire Guild.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Yani & Gunawan Wijaya, Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.
H.M.N. Purwosutjipto, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia 2, Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan, Jakarta: Djambatan, .2005.
IG. Rai Widjaya, Hukum Perusahaan (Undang-Undang dan Peraturan Pelaksana Undang-Undang di Bidang Usaha), Bekasi: Mega Poin, Divisi dari Kesain Blanc, 2005.
Imran Nating, Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Khairunnisa, Kedudukan, Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Direksi, Medan: Pasca Sarjana, 2008.
Munir Fuady, Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Edisi Revisi (Disesuaikan dengan UU Nomor 37 Tahun 2004), Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Sakti, 2005.
Richard Burton Simatupang, Aspek Hukum Bisnis Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Rudy Prasetya, Kedudukan Mandiri Perseroan Terbatas, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995.
Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Dagang, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Soekardono, Hukum Dagang Indonesia, Jilid 1 Bagian Kedua, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1991.
Sutan Remi Sjahdeini, Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Faillissementverordening Juncto Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004, Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2007.
Zainal Asikin, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata)
,Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (KUHD)
,Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang
Hukumonline.com, 2009, Tanya Jawab Hukum Perusahaan/hukumonline.com; Cet.1, (Jakarta Visimedia, Jakarta)