PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PIDANA PENJARA MELEBIHI KETENTUAN PIDANA MAKSIMUM: Risca Agustin

admin admin

doi:10.46257/jrh.v21i2.24

Authors

admin admin Universitas Islam Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v21i2.24

Keywords:

Judges Consideration, The Falling of Imprisonment Decisions, Maximum Criminal

Abstract

In each judge's decision, it should exist the consideration as the reason from the decision taken. In executing the decision, it should be based on the applicable legislation rules. The supreme court in rate an appeal can cancel a verdict or determination of the courts who located within the judicial underneath by the reasons, namely: not authorised or going beyond the authority, any apply or breaking the law and neglectful meeting requirements required by the law and the rule threatening omission of that decision which is cancelled. The method of this research is a yuridicial normative. This research attempts to know whether the judge consideration in a verdict MA No. 52 K/ Pid.Sus/ 2013 about corruption exceeding the maximum imprisonment, to find out the judicial decision that exceeds criminal maximum in accordance with the regulations. The result in this study is the decisions of the supreme court No. 52 K/ Pid.Sis/ 2013 in which the judge consideration supreme court is the decision on the high court in line with the rule of legislation. Whereas, supreme court judges rejected an appeal that proposed by Gayus H.P Tambunan. the decisions are inflected by a judge that should be based on the rules that has been set up in legislation. The length of an imprisonment that must be lived for 30 years in which it was not in accordance with legislative's regulation article 12 the book of the act of criminal law governing the length of an imprisonment during a certain time certainly may not exceed twenty years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

admin admin, Universitas Islam Jakarta

Jurnal Reformasi Hukum merupakan jurnal hukum yang terbit 1 tahun 2 kali, yaitu yang pertama januari-juni dan kedua juli-desember. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta, dengan tujuan sebagai wadah dan media komunikasi, serta sarana untuk mempublikasikan hasil kajian ilmiah dengan berbagai macam permasalahan yang aktual dalam bidang hukum, bagi kalangan dosen, peneliti, dan masyarakat. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum ini pernah terakreditasi Dikti, yaitu berdasarkan SK Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas Nomor 02/DIKTI/KEP/2002 dan SK Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas Nomor 55/DIKTI/KEP/2005.

References

Hamzah, Andi, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Ed. 2. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008.
Hamzah, Andi, Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1993.
Lamintang, P.A.F & Theo Lamintang, Hukum Penitentier Indonesia, Ed. 2 Cet. 2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.
Lamintang, P.A.F., Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.
Mulyadi, Lilik, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana; Teori Praktik, Teknik Penysunan, dan Permasalahannya, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.
Muhammad, Rusli, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.
Pangabean, Mompang L, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier di Indonesia, UKI Press, Jakarta, 2005.
R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia, Bogor, 1991
Setiady, Tolib, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2010.
T.M. Hasi Ash-Shiddieqy, Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Islam, Bandung.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
.Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
.Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
.Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.