LEGAL EFFORTS ON DECREE OF THE MINISTER OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES (STUDY OF DISPUTE OF DISCOVERY OF GOLKAR PARTY)
Aryo Wirro Bimo Herdianto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v22i2.33Keywords:
Legal Efforts, Political Party SettingAbstract
The Ministry of Law and HAM is authorized to execute Administrative Law. As set forth in Article 4 paragraphs 1-4 of Law No. 2 of 2011 on changes to Law No. 2 of 2008 on the Political Party which reads: “(1) The Ministry receives the registration and research and / or verification of equipment and truth as referred to in Article 2 and Article 3 paragraph (2); (2) The review and/or verification as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be undertaken at least 45 (forty-five) days after receipt of the complete requirements document; (3) The endorsement of the Political Party into a Legal Entity is made with the decision of the Minister at least 15 (fifteen) days after the end of the research and / or verification process; (4) The Minister's decision on endorsement of the Political Party as referred to in paragraph (3) shall be announced in the State of the Republic of Indonesia. However, the fact that Kemenkumham did not carry out its duties in accordance with Law No. 2 of 2011 on changes to Law No. 2 of 2008 on the Political Party. In the case of the Golkar party dispute, the government intervened in the ruling Golkar party, as the Decree issued by the Minister of Justice and HAM had no clear legal basis. Decree issued by the Minister of Justice and Human Rights confirming the ruling of the Laksono golkar party on the basis of the judgment of the Golkar party Court. While the Golkar Party Court itself, as the Internal Authority dealing with the case of the Golkar Party's dispute, has not ruled that the ruling of the Laksono Supreme Court is legitimate, but the content of the verdict is that the Golkar Party Court has not endorsed both (Laksono and Aburizal Bakrie's stronghold) due to differences of opinion and disagreements between the Golkar Party court and ordered that the case be brought to the State Court.
Downloads
References
Firdaus, Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik, Bandung : Perpustakaan Unpad, 2015.
Karim, M. Rusli. Perjalanan Partai Politik Di Indonesia : Sebuah Potret Pasang-Surut, Jakarta : Rajawali Press, 1993.
Poerwadarminta, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta:Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Depdiknas, Balai Pustaka, 1986
Rojak, Jeje Abd. Politik KenegaraanAl-Ghazali Dan Ibnu Taimiyyah, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1999
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.
, Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagaimana Telah Diubah Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
, Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
, Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 08/PMK/2006 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara
, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia R.I Nomor M.HH-05.OT.01.01 Tahun 2010 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
, Anggaran Dasar Dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga Partai Persatuan Pembangunan, pasal 22 ayat (1)
Website Berita Kompasiana, Dualisme Parpol tinjauan dari sisi hukum. http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2015/03/28/dualisme-parpol-tinjauan-dari-sisi-hukum-709390.html, diakses 17 Juli 2018.
Website Wikipedia, Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kementerian_Hukum_dan_Hak_Asasi_Manusia_Republik_Indonesia, diakses 17 Juli 2018.
Website Dakwatuna. SK MenkumHAM perkeruh Konflik Internal. http://www.dakwatuna.com/2014/10/29/59103/sk-menkumHAM-perkeruh-konflik-internalppp/#axzz3XedACZb6, diakses 17 Juli 2018.
